Compensation Strategies: Tracking Movement in EFL Learners’ Speaking Skills
AbstractThe present study aimed to determine the compensation strategies used by Iranian elementary EFL learners across the speaking skill. The participants of this study were a sample of 120 EFL elementary male and female learners whose ages ranged between 11 and 25 at a language institute in Rostam, Iran. The main participants were homogenized through the Standardized Key English Test (KET). After the administration of the proficiency test, some oral exams consisting of different speaking topics were administered in the first and following sessions of the course with the purpose of observing and identifying the compensation strategies used by the EFL learners with the same proficiency level. Oxford’s typology of compensation strategies was prepared in form of a checklist to facilitate fast recording of observable compensation strategies in an oral exams. The students’ speaking on the given topics merely served as an opportunity to observe students’ use of compensation strategies. The results indicated that Iranian EFL students tended to use various kinds of compensation strategies in communicating their intended meanings.
Bialystok,E. (1990). Communication Strategies. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chamot, A.U., & El-Dinary, P.B. (1999). Children's learning strategies in immersion classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 83(3), 319-341.
Council of Europe (2011) Education and languages: Language Policy Division. Available at:http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Historique_EN.asp (Retrieved on February 18, 2011).
Danserau, D. F. 1978: The development of a learning strategies curriculum. Learning Strategies. Ed. H. F. O'Neil, Jr. New York: Academic, 1978: 1-29.
El-Dib, M.A.B. (2004). Language learning strategies in Kuwait: Links to gender, language level, and culture in a hybrid context. Foreign Language Annals, 37, 85-95.
Faerch, C. andKasper, G. (1983a). Plans and strategiesin foreign language communication. In C.
Faerch and G. Kasper (eds), Strategies in Interlanguage Communication. London: Longman, 20 60.
Fewell, N. (2010). Language learning strategies and English language proficiency: An investigation of Japanese EFL university students. TESOL Journal, 2, 159-174.
Fleming, F. and Walls, J. 1998: What pupils do: the role of strategic planning in modern foreign language learning. Language Learning Journal, 18, 14-21.
Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29 (2), 261-297.
Harlow, L. L. (1988). The effects of the yellow highlighter- second-language learner strategies and their effectiveness: a research update. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 45, 91-102.
Hong-Nam, K., & LeavellL. G. (2006). Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context. System, 34, 399-415.
Karbalaei, A.R. (2013). The effect of metacognitive listening strategy training on listening comprehension in Iranian EFL context, European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences (ISI Journal), 2 (2).
Khanji, R. (1996). Two Perspectives in Analyzing Communication Strategies. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 34 (2), 144-155.
Margolis, D. P. (2001). Compensation strategies by Korean students. The PAC Journal, 1 (1), 163-174.
Moattarian, A., & Tahririan, M. (2013). Communication strategies used in oral and written performances of EFL learners from different proficiency levels: The case of Iranian university students. Sheikhbahaee EFL Journal, 2 (1), 21-37.
O'Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990).Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Russo, R. P. and Kupper, L. J,
b: Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 557-584.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Oxford, R., Cho, Y., Leung, S., & Kim, H-J. (2004). Effect of the presence and difficulty of task on strategy use: An exploratory study. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 42, 1-47.
Pazhak, A. (2007). An investigation on Iranian EFL learners’ application of avoidance strategies in their writings. Iranian Journal of Language Studies (IJLS), 1(1), 1-14.
Reiss, M. A. 1985: The good language learner: another look. Canadian Modern Language Review, 41, 511-523.
Rubin J. (1975). What the "good language learner " can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9 (1), 41-51
Stern, H.H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31, 304-318.
Stern H. H. (1983). Fundamental Concepts of Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 152 86.
Rahimi, M., Riazi, A. and Saif, S. (2008). An investigation into the factors affecting the use of language learning strategies by Persian EFL Learners. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11 (2), 31–60.
Tajedin, Z., & Alemi, M. (2010). Less proficient vs. more proficient L2 learners’ preferences for compensation strategies: L1-based, L2-based, and non-linguistic. LiBRI. Linguistic and Literary Broad Research and Innovation, 1 (2), 48-55.
Tarone, E. (1977). Conscious Communication Strategies in Interlanguage. In H. D. Brown et al. (ed.), TESOL. Washington, DC: TESOL.
Zarei, A. A., & Elekaei, A. (2013). The Effect of Attitude on L2 Learners' Choice of Compensation & Meta-cognitive Strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2 (1), 350-356.