Interaction in a Blended Environment for English Language Learning

  • Yuranny Marcela Romero Archila Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
Keywords: Blended learning (B-learning), English as a foreign language, interaction, Virtual Learning Environment (VLE)


The purpose of this research was to identify the types of interaction that emerged not only in a Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) but also in faceto-face settings. The study also assessed the impact of the different kinds of interactions in terms of language learning. This is a qualitative case study that took place in a private Colombian university. Theories related to interaction, foreign language learning, and the use of technology in the EFL classroom were taken into account for analyzing the data. The data revealed a new type of interaction and the need to have specific subdivisions of the established types of interaction.


Download data is not yet available.


Bogdan, R. & Biklen, S. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Bonk, C. & Graham, C. (2005). Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.

Brown, H. (1994). Teaching by principles. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Cámara, P. (2006). El uso de una plataforma virtual como recurso didáctico en la asignatura de filosofía. Una investigación- acción en bachillerato. Spain: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona

Retrieved from

Ellis, R. (1999). Learning a second language through interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Frendo, E (2005). How to Teach Business English Harlow: Longman

Gilbert, L. & Moore, D. (1998). Building interactivity into web sources: Tools for social and instructional interaction. Educational Technology, 38(3), 29-35.

Hanna, D., Glowacki-Dudka, M. & Conceição-Runlee, S. (2000). 147 practical tips for teaching online groups. Essentials of web-based education. Madison: Atwood Publishing.

Herazo, J. (2010). Authentic oral interaction in the EFL Class: What it means, what it does not. Profile, 12(1), 47-61.

Hillman, D., Willis, D. & Gunawardena, C. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30 – 42.

Kessler, G. (2007). Formal and informal CALL preparation and teacher attitude toward technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(2), 173-188.

Klink, M. (2006). The use of interaction methods in a blended learning environment: Evaluating the use of interaction methods in the blended learning environment in two courses of a Masters program at the University of South Australia, unit Systems Engineering & Evaluation Centre. Enschede: University of Twente.

Retrieved from:

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Leakey, J. & Ranchoux, A. (2006). BLINGUA: A blended learning approach for CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(4), 357 – 372.

Menezes, V. (2010). Interaction and second language acquisition: An ecological perspective. Retrieved from

Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.

Prensky, M (2001) Digital natives, digital inmigrants.

Retrieved from:,%20digital%20immigrants%20-%20part1.pdf

Sharma, P. & Barret, B. (2007) Blended learning: Using technology in and beyond the language classroom. Thailand: Macmillan

Su, B., Bonk, C. J., Magjuka, R., Liu, X., Lee, S. H. (2005). The importance of interaction in web-based education: A program-level case study of online MBA courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(1).

Retrieved from

How to Cite
Romero Archila, Y. M. (2014). Interaction in a Blended Environment for English Language Learning. GiST Education and Learning Research Journal, (9 JUL-DEC), 142-156.