Effectiveness of Systemic Text Analysis in EFL Writing Instruction

  • Ender Velasco Tovar British Council
Keywords: EFL writing, cohesion, coherence, thematic patterns, text analysis

Abstract

This action research study investigates the effectiveness of a model based on the theory of systemic text analysis for the teaching of EFL writing. Employing students’ pieces of writing and a teachers’ survey as data collection instruments, the writing performance of a group of monolingual intermediate level adult students enrolled on a private EFL school in Bogota, Colombia was gauged before and after the model implementation. The results suggest that the proposed model is somewhat effective for the teaching of factual EFL writing and that it has a seemingly positive effect on the writing performance of EFL students in terms of cohesion and coherence at the paragraph level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ender Velasco Tovar, British Council

Ender Velasco Tovar holds a Cambridge CELTA and DTELLS, and a MA in Applied Linguistics and TESOL. He has over 10 years teaching experience in various contexts in the UK and Colombia. He has written for specialized journals such as CALJ, and has recently published a book entitled A Brief Introduction to ELT Methodology. His research interests include: the application of text analysis to the EFL classroom, EFL writing and ELT methodology.

References

Bell, J. (2010). Doing your research project (5th ed.). Berkshire: Open University Press – McGraw-Hill Education. Bloor, T. & Bloor, M. (2013). The functional analysis of English (3rd ed.). Oxon: Routledge. Cheng, F. W. (2008). Scaffolding language, scaffolding writing: a genre approach to teaching narrative writing. Asian EFL Journal, 10(2), 167-191. Connor, U., & Farmer, M. (1990). The teaching of topical structure analysis as a revision strategy for ESL writers. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom, (pp. 126-139). New York: Cambridge University Press. Cumming, A. & Riazi, A. (2000). Building models of adult secondlanguage instruction. Learning and Instruction, 10(1), 55-71. Davies, F. (1988). Designing a writing syllabus in English for academic purposes: Process and product. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Academic writing: Process and Product, ELT Documents, 129 (pp. 130-142). Denscombe, M. (2010). The good research guide for small-scale social research projects (4th ed.). Berkshire: Open University Press – McGraw-Hill Education. Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). London: Continuum. Flowerdew, L. (2000). Using a genre-based framework to teach organizational structure in academic writing. ELT Journal, 54(4), 369-378. Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold. Horner, B. & Min-Zhan, L. (1999). The birth of basic writing. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. Keck, C. (2006). The use of paraphrase in summary writing: a comparison of L1 and L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(4), 261-78. Kongpetch, S. (2006). Using a genre-based approach to teach writing to Thai students: a case study. Prospect, 21(2), 3-33. Olivas, M. & Li, C. (2006). Understanding stressors of international students in higher education: What college counsellors and personnel need to know. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33, 217-222.

Rojas, S. (2014). Linguistics at university Level: The challenge of its learning process in a program of bilingual education. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, 8 (January-June), 156-170. Sidaway, R. (2006). The genre-based approach to teach writing. In English!, Spring, 24-27. Wall, D., Nickson, A., Jordan, R., Allwright, J., & Houghton, D. (1988). Developing student writing – A subject tutor and writing tutors compare points of view. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Academic Writing: Process and Product, ELT Documents, 129, (pp. 117-129). Woodrow, L. (2006). Enlish in academic setting: A postgraduate course for students from non-English speaking backgrounds. In Snow & Kamhi-Stein (Eds.), Developing a new course for adult learners (pp. 197-218). TESOL Publications. Yuan-Shan, C. and Shao-Wen, S. (2011). A genre-based approach to teaching EFL summary writing. ELT Journal, 1-9. doi:10.1093/elt/ ccro61. Yu, G. (2009). The shifting sands in the effects of source text summarizability on summary writing. Assessing Writing, 14(2), 116-37. Texts adaptations in the Literature Review section Examples of continuous and split thematic patterns. Texts adapted from: Royal Botanic Gardens Kew – ‘Marianne north and the North Gallery, Kew’. Key Information Sheet K9. Example of split thematic pattern. Text adapted from Doerner, M. (1949). The Materials of the Artist and Their Use in Painting: with notes on the techniques of the old masters. New York: Mariner Books.

Published
2016-12-21
How to Cite
Velasco Tovar, E. (2016). Effectiveness of Systemic Text Analysis in EFL Writing Instruction. GiST Education and Learning Research Journal, (13), 11-33. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.310