Understanding Language Teaching From Method to Postmethod

  • Nancy Bautista Pérez Universidad del Tolima


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nancy Bautista Pérez, Universidad del Tolima

Nancy Bautista Pérez has a B.A. in English, a Specialization in English Teaching and is working on a research project for an M.A. in English Didactics at Tolima University. She has twelve years of experience as a language teacher in both English and Portuguese. She has worked for Universidad de Ibagué, and Universidad del Tolima, Currently, she is a full time professor at the Universidad Cooperativa.  In 2009 she participated in a “Diplomado in lingua portuguesa” in Leticia Amazonas, and in 2015 she was one of the speakers in the 3rd.Conference of Foreign Language Research at the Tolima University the topic was about the importance of Understanding and Reflecting upon Language Policies. 


Allwright, R. L. (1991). The death of the method (Working Paper #10). The Exploratory Practice Centre, The University of Lancaster, England.
Byram, M. and Risager K. (1999). Language Teachers Politics and Cultures, Multilingual Matters Ltd., Philadelphia, USA.
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a Global Language, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdon.
Jenkis, H. (2006). Where Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide, University Press, New York
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.

Kumaravadivelu, (2003) Beyond Methods : Macrostrategies for Language Teaching. Yale University Press New Haven London. Published with assistance from the Louis Stern Memorial Fund. Copyright © 2003 by Yale University.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994a). The postmethod condition: (E)merging strategies for second/foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 28:1:27–48.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (1993b). The name of the task and the task of naming: Methodological aspects of task-based pedagogy. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in a pedagogical context (pp. 69–96). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.

Nunan, D. (1987). Communicative language teaching: Making it work. ELT Journal 41/2:136–45

Pennycook, A. (1989). The concept of method, interested knowledge, and the politics of language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 589–618.

Prabhu, N. S. (1990). There is no best method—why? TESOL Quarterly, 24, 161–176.

Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swaffar, J., Arens, K., & Morgan, M. (1982). Teacher classroom practices: Redefining method as task hierarchy. Modern Language Journal, 66, 24–33.

Thornbury, S. (1996). Teachers research teacher talk. ELT Journal, 50: 279– 88.

A.P.I.S.E. Asociación de Profesores de Inglés de Santiago del Estereo. FAAPI Conference 39th. English Language Teaching in the postmethod era: A view from Argentina. ISBN 978-987-24550-1-9. , Santiago del Estereo, Argentina, 2014.

Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 16(1). 81-92.Teaching Culture in Colombia Bilingüe: From Theory to practice. Printed ISN 0123-4641 (pages: 81-92), Vol.16., January-June 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2014.1.a07

RBLA, Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, ISSN: 1676-0786, Belo Horizonte, V.13,n.2,p.375-398. 2013. rblasecretaria@gmail.com, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
How to Cite
Bautista Pérez, N. (2017). Understanding Language Teaching From Method to Postmethod. GiST Education and Learning Research Journal, (14), 158-164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.362