Exploring the effects of teachers’ and learners’ beliefs: The scarcity of corrective feedback during uncontrolled EFL classroom interactions

  • Edgar Emmanuell García-Ponce Universidad de Guanajuato
  • Irasema Mora-Pablo Universidad de Guanajuato
Keywords: accuracy, classroom interactions, corrective feedback, English as a foreign language, teacher and learner beliefs

Abstract

Extensive research literature suggests that corrective feedback (CF), when effective, has a beneficial impact on the development of learners’ interlanguage. This is because CF provides learners with language data concerning the correctness of their utterances and thus pushes their oral production towards greater clarity, accuracy and comprehensibility. However, CF has been found to be considerably scarce during classroom interactions. In an attempt to understand its scarcity, the present study investigates the interplay between the amount of CF provided by teachers and learner peers and the effects of their beliefs during uncontrolled classroom interactions at a Mexican university. By combining data collected from recorded classroom interactions, teacher interviews and learner focus groups, the findings show that there was a considerable number of errors which were avoided and not corrected by the teachers and learners during the classroom interactions. The findings also suggest that the scarcity of CF was in response to the teachers’ and learners’ conflicting beliefs about CF. This study provides a great opportunity to direct research towards the effects of teachers’ and learners’ beliefs on providing and receiving CF during classroom interactions, and find ways through which a socio-affective climate can be promoted in the language classroom in order to facilitate the provision of CF.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Edgar Emmanuell García-Ponce, Universidad de Guanajuato

Edgar Emmanuell García holds an MA in Applied Linguistics (UAEMex, Mexico), and a PhD in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (University of Birmingham, UK). His research interests are centred on the interplay between classroom interactions and teacher and learner beliefs. He currently teaches in BA in TESOL and MA in Applied Linguistics of English Language Teaching at the Departamento de Lenguas, Universidad de Guanajuato.

Irasema Mora-Pablo, Universidad de Guanajuato

Irasema Mora Pablo holds an MA in Applied Linguistics (Universidad de las Américas-Puebla) and a PhD in Applied Linguistics (University of Kent, UK). She coordinates the the Master’s in Applied Linguistics of English Language Teaching at the Universidad de Guanajuato. She is a member of the National System of Researchers (Sistema Nacional de Investigadores) and her research interests are bilingual studies, identity and nativespeakerism.

References

Allwright, D. & Bailey, K. M. (1991). Focus on the language learner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Braidi, S. M. (2002). Reexamining the role of recasts in native-speaker/nonnative-speaker interactions. Language Learning, 52, 1-42

Cathcart, R. L. & Olsen J. W. B. (1976). Teachers’ and students’ preferences for correction of classroom conversation errors. In J. F. Fanselow & R. H. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL ’76, 41-45. Washington, D.C.: TESOL.

Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R. (2006). Researching the effects of form-focused instruction on L2 acquisition. In K. Bardovi-Harlig & Z. Dornyei (Eds.), Themes in SLA Research. AILA, 19, 18-41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ellis, R. (2009). CF and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1, 3-18.

Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2005). Implicit and explicit CF and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339-368.

García Mayo, M. P. & Pica, T. (2000). L2 learner interaction in a foreign language setting: Are learning needs addressed? IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics, 38(1), 35-58.

Gibbs, A. (1997). Focus Groups. Social Research Update, 19, Winter, Department of Sociology, University of Surrey. Retrieved January 12, 2016, from http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU19.html

Havranek, G. (2002). When is negative feedback likely to succeed? International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3–4), 255–270.

Hendrickson, J. M. (1978). Error correction in foreign language teaching: recent theory, research, and practice. Modern Language Journal, 62, 387-398.

Larsen-Freeman, D. & Long, M. H. (1991). An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research. London: Pearson.

Li, S., & Liang, W. (2012). The dynamic nature of learner beliefs: the relationship between beliefs about EFL learning and proficiency in a Chinese context. System, 14(1), 177-211.

Lillis, T. M. (2008). Ethnography as Method, Methodology, and “Deep Theorizing”: Closing the Gap between Text and Context in Academic Writing Research. Written Communication, 25(3), 353–388.

Long, M. H. & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Long, M. H. (1980). Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UCLA, Department of Applied Linguistics and TESL.

Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399-432.

Martínez-Flor, A. (1999). Does Language Learners Benefit from Classroom Interaction? Jornades de Foment de la Investigació, Universitat Jaume I.

McDonough, K. (2004). Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32(2), 207–224.

Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50(4): 617–673.

Naughton, D. (2006). Cooperative strategy training and oral interaction: Enhancing small group communication in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 169-184.

Navarro, D. & Thornton, K. (2011). Investigating the relationship between belief and action in self-directed language learning. System, 39(3), 290–301.

Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P. M. & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning 51(4): 719.758.

Philp, J. & Tognini, R. (2009). Language acquisition in foreign language contexts and the differential benefits of interaction. IRAL, 47(3/4): 245–66.

Rassaei, E. (2014). Scaffolded feedback, recasts, and L2 development: A sociocultural perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 98, 417–431.

Russell, V. (2009). Corrective feedback, over a decade of research since Lyster and Ranta (1997): Where do we stand today? Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 6(1): 21-31.

Sheen, Y. (2010). Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32(2): 203-234.

Snape, D. & Spencer, L. (2003). The foundations of qualitative research. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice. A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 1–23). London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Swain, M. & Suzuki, W. (2008). Interaction, output, and communicative language learning. In B. Spolsky & F. M. Hult (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 557–568). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Tedick, D. & de Gortari, B. (1998). Research on error correction and implications for classroom teaching. The ACIE Newsletter, 1(3).

Tsui, A. B. M. (1995). Introducing classroom interaction. London: Penguin English.

Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. London: Routledge.

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: language in action. London: Routledge.

Walsh, S. (2013). Classroom discourse and teacher development. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Wesely, P. (2012). Learner attitudes, perceptions, and beliefs in language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 45(S1), 98-117.

Yang, J. S. & Kim, T.Y. (2011). Sociocultural analysis of second language learner beliefs: A qualitative case study of two study-abroad ESL learners. System, 39(3), 325–334.

Yoshida, R. (2013). Conflict between learners' beliefs and actions: Speaking in the classroom. Language Awareness, 22(4), 371-388.
Published
2018-01-23
How to Cite
García-Ponce, E. E., & Mora-Pablo, I. (2018). Exploring the effects of teachers’ and learners’ beliefs: The scarcity of corrective feedback during uncontrolled EFL classroom interactions. GiST Education and Learning Research Journal, (15), 125-148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.393