Situated Practice in CLIL: Voices from Colombian Teachers
The purpose of this exploratory qualitative study was to determine the factors and conditions that intervene in the implementation of CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) in diverse Colombian educational contexts. This study was conducted at five private schools from different cities and towns in the country (Bogotá, Chía, Tenjo, Facatativá, and Girardot). Data was collected from three sources (interviews, questionnaires, and field journals). Data analysis procedures included the use of triangulation and validation procedures through the grounded theory approach. Findings revealed that teachers still have complications understanding CLIL as an approach that goes beyond the mere usage of the target language in content. Instead, the study advocates for the inclusion of essential lifelong skills (i.e. creativity, critical thinking, collaboration, and communication) when implementing CLIL in the classroom. Results also indicated that staged lesson planning is scarce, and that teachers’ practices still emphasize the scope and sequence plan provided by the textbook used in the institutions. Hence, the study supports the design and implementation of CLIL professional development programs that through scaffolding can assist teachers in viewing and situating CLIL as a dialogic pedagogical approach. Not only does the approach help teachers make use of their existing knowledge of CLIL, but also helps them materialize ways through which language and content can be integrated. It does so by making use of students’ primary knowledge and mapping achievable routes for effective educational enrichment not restricted to language and content classrooms but expanded into other formal and non-formal learning contexts.
Key words: CLIL, professional development, CLIL planning, lifelong learning.
Babocká, M. (2015). Assessment in CLIL classes. In S. et al. Pokrivčáková (Ed.), CLIL in foreign language Education: E-textbook for foreign language teachers (pp. 176–188). Nitra: Constantine the Philosopher University. Retrieved from: https://educ.tedu.edu.tr/sites/default/files/content_files/research_files/e-textbook_clil_in_fle_-_final2.pdf
Banegas, D. L. (2014). An investigation into CLIL-related sections of EFL coursebooks: Issues of CLIL inclusion in the publishing market. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 17(3), 345–359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.793651
Biçaku, R. Ç. /. (2011). CLIL and teacher training. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3821–3825. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.379
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Cambridge, U. of. (2011). Using the CEFR: Principles of good practice. Retrieved from https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/Images/126011-using-cefr-principles-of-good-practice.pdf
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
Çelik, S., & Aytin, K. (2014). Teachers’ views on digital educational tools in English language learning: Benefits and challenges in the Turkish context. TESL-EJ, 18(2), 1–18. Retrieved from http://www.tesl-ej.org/pdf/ej70/a1.pdf
Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York City, NY: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203720967
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Corden, A., & Sainsbury, R. (2006). Verbatim quotations in applied social research: theory, practice and impact. Manchester, UK.
Coyle, D. (2006). Content and language integrated learning, motivating learners and teachers. Scottish Languages Review, (13), 1–18. Retrieved from https://www.scilt.org.uk/Portals/24/Library/slr/issues/13/SLR13_Coyle.pdf
Coyle, D., Marsh, D., & Hood, P. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, John, W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Cuesta Medina, L. (2018). Blended learning: Deficits and prospects in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 42–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3100
Czura, A. (2017). Translation is not enough - The need for pedagogical adaptation in CLIL textbook development. Porta Linguarum, 2017(27), 35–46.
Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2014). CLIL and motivation: The effect of individual and contextual variables. Language Learning Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.889508
Fash, S., Harris, S., Hobbs, M., & Keddle, J. (2012). Thumbs-Up. China: Richmond.
Ferrer Ariza, E., & Poole, P. M. (2018). Creating a teacher development program linked to curriculum renewal. Profile: Issues in Teachers´ Professional Development, 20(2), 249–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/profile.v20n2.67937
Fortune, T. W., & Tedick, D. J. (2008). One-way, Two-way and Indigenous Immersion: A Call for Cross- Fertilization:
Evolving perspectives on immersion education. In T. W. Fortune & D. J. Tedick (Eds.), Pathways to multilingualism:
Evolving perspectives on immersion education (pp. 3–21). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters, Ltd.
Friedemann, M.-L., Mayorga, C., & Jimenez, L. D. (2011). Data collectors’ field journals as tools for research.
Journal of Research in Nursing, 16(5), 453–465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1744987110387319
Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivational variables in second-language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 13(4), 266–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0083787
González Moncada, A. (2007). Professional development of EFL teachers in Colombia: Between colonial and local practices. Ïkala, 12(1), 309 – 332. Retrieved from https://aprendeenlinea.udea.edu.co/revistas/index.php/ikala/article/view/2722
González Moncada, A., & Quinchía Ortiz, D. I. (2011). Tomorrow’s EFL teacher educators. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, (5), 86. http://dx.doi.org/10.14483/22487085.183
Granados Beltrán, C. (2009). A framework for the construction of academic communities. Revista Folios, (30), 39–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.17227/01234870.30folios39.50
Henderson, R. (2012). Teaching literacies in the middle years: Pedagogies and diversity. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
Ioannou-Georgiou, S., & Pavlou, P. (2003). Assessing young learners. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kajornboon, A. B. (2005). Using interviews as research instruments. E-Journal for Researching Teachers (EJRT), 2(1), 1–8.
Kewara, P., & Prabjandee, D. (2018). CLIL teacher professional development for content teachers in Thailand. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 93–108. Retrieved from http://ijltr.urmia.ac.ir/article_20492.html
Korosidou, E., & Griva, E. (2016). “It’s the same world through different eyes”: A CLIL project for EFL young learners. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 18(1), 116. http://dx.doi.org/10.14483/calj.v18n1.9305
LaFond, L., & Dogancay-Aktuna, S. (2009). Teacher perspectives on linguistics in TESOL teacher education.
Language Awareness, 18(3–4), 345–365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658410903197348
Liu, H., Lin, C.-H., & Zhang, D. (2017). Pedagogical beliefs and attitudes toward information and communication technology: a survey of teachers of English as a foreign language in China. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 745–765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1347572
Lo, Y. Y. (2014). Collaboration between L2 and content subject teachers in CBI: Contrasting beliefs and attitudes. RELC Journal, 45(2), 181–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0033688214535054
López Medina, B. (2016). Developing a CLIL textbook evaluation checklist. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(1), 159–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.1.7
Mariño, C. M. (2014). Towards implementing CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) at CBS (Tunja, Colombia). Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 16(2), 151. http://dx.doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2014.2.a02
McDougald, J. S. (2013). The use of new technologies among in-service Colombian ELT teachers. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 15(2), 247–264. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123-46412013000200008&lng=en&tlng=en.
Mendieta Aguilar, J. A. (2009). Inquiry as an opportunity to make things differently in the language classroom. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, (11), 124–135.
Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2016). Lineamientos estándar para proyectos de fortalecimiento del inglés. Retrieved from https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1759/articles-357562_recurso_3.pdf
Ministerio de Educación Nacional, M. (2006). Formar en lenguas extranjeras: Inglés !el reto! . Bogotá, Colombia, Colombia: Imprenta Nacional.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
Muhsen Al Harbi, A. A. (2017). Evaluation study for secondary stage EFL textbook: EFL teachers’ perspectives. English Language Teaching, 10(3), 26. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n3p26
Nicolaidis, K., & Mattheoudakis, M. (2008). Utopia vs. reality: the effectiveness of in‐service training courses for EFL teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 31(3), 279–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02619760802208460
Onofrei, S. (2016). Access and use of new ICT resources in Romanian schools. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 9(4), 25–34. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1132908
Otwinowska, A., & Foryś, M. (2017). They learn the CLIL way, but do they like it? Affectivity and cognition in upper-primary CLIL classes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(5), 457–480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1051944
Pappa, S., Moate, J., Ruohotie-Lyhty, M., & Eteläpelto, A. (2017). Teacher agency within the Finnish CLIL context: tensions and resources. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1286292
Rodríguez-Bonces, J. (2012). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Considerations in the Colombian context. GiST Education and Learning Research Journal, (6), 177–189. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1062605.pdf
Rodriguez Bonces, M. (2011). CLILL: Colombia leading into content language learning. Ikala, 16(2), 79–89. Retrieved from https://aprendeenlinea.udea.edu.co/revistas/index.php/ikala/article/view/9912
Snow, D. (2015). English teaching, intercultural competence, and critical incident exercises. Language and Intercultural Communication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2014.980746
Sylvén, L. K. (2013). CLIL in Sweden – why does it not work? A metaperspective on CLIL across contexts in Europe. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 301–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777387
The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
Trujillo Becerra, C. L., Alvarez Ayure, C. P., Zamudio Ordoñez, M. N., & Morales Bohórquez, G. (2015). Facilitating vocabulary learning through metacognitive strategy training and learning journals. Colombian Applied
Linguistics Journal, 17(2), 246. http://dx.doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2015.2.a05
Vázquez, V. P., & Alcalá, F. R. (2010). Teachers’s concerns and uncertainties about the introduction of CLIL programmes. Porta Linguarum : Revista Internacional de Didáctica de Las Lenguas Extranjeras, 14, 45–58. Retrieved from http://rabida.uhu.es/dspace/handle/10272/6790
Viáfara, J. J., & Largo, J. D. (2018). Colombian English teachers’ professional development: The case of master programs. Profile: Issues in Teachers´ Professional Development, 20(1), 103–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/profile.v20n1.63323
Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. Cambridge, England: MFT Press.
Zein, M. S. (2017). Professional development needs of primary EFL teachers: perspectives of teachers and teacher educators. Professional Development in Education, 43(2), 293–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1156013
Zhyrun, I. (2016). Culture through comparison: creating audio-visual listening materials for a CLIL course. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(2), 345–373. http://dx.doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2.5
Copyright (c) 2019 GiST Education and Learning Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.